Key result
LV aneurysmectomy linked to improved LVEF and reduced end-systolic stress versus CABG at 8 months.
Why the study?
Changes of regional wall stress and systolic function in the noninfarcted segment before and after LV aneurysmectomy remain poorly understood.
Does LV aneurysmectomy improve regional stress, systolic function, and LV remodeling compared to CABG in patients with anterior LV aneurysm after myocardial infarction?
Cohort (n=21)
Does LV aneurysmectomy improve regional stress, systolic function, and LV remodeling compared to CABG in patients with anterior LV aneurysm after myocardial infarction?
LV aneurysmectomy reduces regional afterload and improves ejection performance of the noninfarcted myocardium, favorably affecting the LV remodeling process after myocardial infarction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support LVA for post-MI remodeling; hypothesis-generating and requires RCTs before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Left-ventricular (LV) aneurysm formation after myocardial infarction (MI) leads to LV remodeling with global and regional cardiac dysfunction. LV aneurysmectomy (LVA) can often improve LV function, but changes of regional wall stress and systolic function in the noninfarcted segment before and after the operation remain poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of LVA on regional stress and systolic function in the noninfarcted region and to examine this procedure's impact on the LV remodeling in patients with LV aneurysm after myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS: Using quantitative left ventriculography and pressure measurements, 11 patients with an anterior LV aneurysm were studied before and 8 months after standard linear repair (LVA group), and 10 patients with an anterior transmural infarction who received coronary artery bypass grafting were also studied (CABG group) in an attempt to separate the effects of aneurysmectomy from the effects of bypass surgery. Regional end-systolic (ESS) and end-diastolic (EDS) stresses of the contractile segment (CS) were computed by Janz's method. RESULTS: The total ejection fraction (EF) increased (p < 0.01) in the LVA group, whereas it did not change in the CABG group at 8 months after surgery. Both the end-diastolic and end-systolic volume indices of CS decreased (p < 0.01 and p < 0.01, respectively) in the LVA group, whereas both remained unchanged in the CABG group. The mean velocity of circumferential fiber shortening (mean Vcf) of CS increased substantially (p < 0.01) in the LVA group and, less significantly (p < 0.05), in the CABG group. Regional ESS and EDS decreased (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively) in the LVA group, whereas both remained unchanged in the CABG group. The increase in mean Vcf correlated strongly with the magnitude of decrease in ESS (r = -0.63, p < 0.01) in the LVA group but not in the CABG group. CONCLUSIONS: LVA can reduce regional afterload and improve ejection performance of the noninfarcted myocardium in many patients with a large anterior LV aneurysm and, moreover, may favorably affect the LV remodeling process after MI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taniguchi et al. (1998) conducted a cohort in Left-ventricular aneurysm after myocardial infarction (n=21). Left-ventricular aneurysmectomy (LVA) vs. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was evaluated on Total ejection fraction and regional end-systolic and end-diastolic stresses (p=<0.01). Left-ventricular aneurysmectomy increased total ejection fraction and decreased regional end-systolic stress at 8 months compared to CABG.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: