Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of antenatal and intrapartum complications and neonatal outcomes among grand multiparas with age-matched multiparas. METHODS: Six hundred twenty-one grand multiparas (para more than 4) women were prospectively compared with 621 age-matched multiparous (para 2-4) controls. RESULTS: Grand multiparity was associated with low socioeconomic status and education (odds ratio [OR]6.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.5, 9.0), poorer prenatal care (OR 3.1; 95% CI 1.5, 6.1), smoking (OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.5, 3.2), and alcohol consumption (OR 9.0; 95% CI 2.1, 39.3). Grand multiparas had a higher body mass index (OR 1.5; 95% CI 1.2, 1.9) and rate of insulin-dependent gestational diabetes (OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.02, 3.1). They had more previous intrauterine (OR 4.2; 95% CI 1.5, 11.3) and perinatal deaths (OR 3.2; 95% CI 2.0, 5.0). They had fewer intrapartum complications (arrests of cervical dilatation [OR 0.19; 95% CI 0.06, 0.66], instrumental deliveries [OR 0.31; 95% CI 0.16, 0.59], and fever during labor [OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.26, 0.86]). Conditional logistic regression models found that grand multiparity was the most closely correlated factor to a previous history of fetal death (OR 4.3; 95% CI 1.6, 11.6), but it was not an independent predictor of insulin-dependent gestational diabetes mellitus (OR 1.3; 95% CI 0.75, 2.2). CONCLUSION: Grand multiparas, when compared with same-age multiparous controls, appear to have fewer intrapartum complications. However, they present several prenatal risk factors that require special antenatal care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roman et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: