Key result
Depletion solutions based on targeted nuclease cleavage significantly perturb the high-resolution information derived from ribosome footprint profiling data.
Nuclease-mediated rRNA depletion methods introduce biases in ribosome footprint profiling and should be avoided in favor of custom biotinylated oligos when precise RNA fragment end determination is required.
Nuclease-based depletion may bias ribosome profiling resolution; leaves open optimal methods for high-fidelity fragment analysis.
Ribosome footprint profiling is a high-throughput sequencing-based technique that provides detailed and global views of translation in living cells. An essential part of this technology is removal of unwanted, normally very abundant, ribosomal RNA sequences that dominate libraries and increase sequencing costs. The most effective commercial solution (Ribo-Zero) has been discontinued as a standalone product and a number of new, experimentally distinct commercial applications have emerged on the market. Here we evaluated several commercially available alternatives designed for RNA-seq of human samples and find them generally unsuitable for ribosome footprint profiling. We instead recommend the use of custom-designed biotinylated oligos, which were widely used in early ribosome profiling studies. Importantly, we warn that depletion solutions based on targeted nuclease cleavage significantly perturb the high-resolution information that can be derived from the data, and thus do not recommend their use for any applications that require precise determination of the ends of RNA fragments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zinshteyn et al. (2020) studied this question. Nuclease-mediated depletion solutions vs. Custom-designed biotinylated oligos was evaluated on Precise determination of the ends of RNA fragments. Depletion solutions based on targeted nuclease cleavage significantly perturb the high-resolution information derived from ribosome footprint profiling data.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: