Key result
Prior anterior MI linked to ~55% abnormal frontal QRS-T angle rate vs. inferior MI.
Why the study?
The effects of myocardial perfusion defect on the frontal QRS-T angle differ between anterior and inferior myocardial infarction and require clarification.
Does the location of myocardial infarction (anterior vs inferior) affect the frontal QRS-T angle?
Observational (n=126)
No
Does the location of myocardial infarction (anterior vs inferior) affect the frontal QRS-T angle?
Absolute Event Rate: 55% vs 2%
p-value: p=<0.001
Anterior myocardial infarction significantly increases the frontal QRS-T angle and is associated with myocardial perfusion defects, whereas inferior MI does not significantly alter this ECG parameter compared to controls.
May aid differentiation of prior MI location; Level 5 data leaves open clinical utility pending validation.
Objective The frontal QRS-T angle on a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) has recently become accepted as a variable of ventricular repolarization. We compared the effects of myocardial perfusion defect (MPD) on the frontal QRS-T angle between anterior and inferior myocardial infarction (MI) using single-photon emission computed tomography. Methods The frontal QRS-T angle was defined as the absolute value of the difference between the frontal plane QRS axis and T-wave axis. A QRS-T angle more than 90° was considered abnormal. Patients Forty-two patients with anterior MI and 42 age- and sex-matched patients with inferior MI were enrolled. For controls, 42 age- and sex-matched patients with no MPD were selected. Results The mean frontal QRS-T angles in anterior MI, inferior MI and control subjects were 94.7±46.2°, 26.7±22.1° and 27.0±23.2°, respectively. Compared with controls, the frontal QRS-T angle was larger in anterior MI subjects (p<0.001), and similar in value to that in inferior MI subjects (p=0.69). An abnormal QRS-T angle was frequent in the anterior MI subjects than the inferior MI subjects (55% vs. 2%, p<0.001). In anterior MI subjects, MPD was significantly associated with the T-wave axis (ρ=0.46, p=0.002) and QRS-T angle (ρ=0.47, p=0.002), but was not with the QRS axis (ρ=0.07, p=0.66). In inferior MI subjects, there were no associations between MPD and the ECG variables. Conclusion Our data suggest that the frontal QRS-T angle in inferior MI subjects is not increased as evidently as that in anterior MI subjects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kurisu et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Prior myocardial infarction (anterior vs. inferior) (n=126). Anterior myocardial infarction vs. Inferior myocardial infarction was evaluated on Abnormal frontal QRS-T angle (>90°) (p=<0.001). An abnormal frontal QRS-T angle was significantly more frequent in patients with prior anterior myocardial infarction compared to those with inferior myocardial infarction (55% vs. 2%, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: