Key result
Factor Xa inhibitors show feasibility over direct thrombin inhibitors for anticoagulation in cfVAD patients.
Why the study?
There is limited data on the use of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with continuous-flow ventricular assist devices, with early reports advising against their use.
Are direct oral anticoagulants feasible alternatives to vitamin K antagonists for systemic anticoagulation in patients with continuous-flow ventricular assist devices?
Systematic Review
Are direct oral anticoagulants feasible alternatives to vitamin K antagonists for systemic anticoagulation in patients with continuous-flow ventricular assist devices?
Despite current guidelines advising against their use, Factor Xa inhibitors may be feasible alternatives for systemic anticoagulation in patients with continuous-flow ventricular assist devices.
Supports factor Xa inhibitor consideration in CF-VAD anticoagulation despite guidelines; challenges recommendations against DOAC use.
The use of continuous-flow ventricular assist devices (cf-VAD) necessitates systemic anticoagulation, routinely with vitamin K antagonists (VKA). Newer direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have significant advantages over VKA in providing a predictable level of systemic anticoagulation without frequent monitoring or strict dietary surveillance. Despite randomized evidence demonstrating their usefulness in several conditions including atrial fibrillation, there is limited data pertaining to their use in cf-VAD patients. Early reports of adverse outcomes has resulted in a Class III recommendation, advising against DOACs generally in cf-VAD patients. Recent reports suggest there may be a role for certain DOACs; as such we present a systematic review identifying studies reporting DOAC uses in patients with a cf-VAD. We identified eight pertinent studies, including a single randomized controlled trial and seven case reports/series. Limited numbers and significant study heterogeneity limits interpretation; however, Factor Xa inhibitors appear to be feasible alternatives, favorable to direct thrombin inhibitors, although further research is required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meredith et al. (2020) conducted a systematic review in Continuous-flow ventricular assist devices (cf-VAD). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) / Factor Xa inhibitors vs. Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) / Direct thrombin inhibitors was evaluated. Factor Xa inhibitors appear to be feasible alternatives, favorable to direct thrombin inhibitors, for anticoagulation in patients with continuous-flow ventricular assist devices.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: