Key result
Novel RCR-net improves AF detection performance by ~7% over state-of-the-art deep learning methods.
Effect estimate: 6.8% improvement
A novel K-margin-based RCR-net improves automated atrial fibrillation detection from noisy ECGs compared to existing deep learning methods.
Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is an abnormal heart rhythm which can trigger cardiac arrest and sudden death. Nevertheless, its interpretation is mostly done by medical experts due to high error rates of computerized interpretation. One study found that only about 66% of AF were correctly recognized from noisy ECGs. This is in part due to insufficient training data, class skewness, as well as semantical ambiguities caused by noisy segments in an ECG record. In this paper, we propose a K-margin-based Residual-Convolution-Recurrent neural network (K-margin-based RCR-net) for AF detection from noisy ECGs. In detail, a skewness-driven dynamic augmentation method is employed to handle the problems of data inadequacy and class imbalance. A novel RCR-net is proposed to automatically extract both long-term rhythm-level and local heartbeat-level characters. Finally, we present a K-margin-based diagnosis model to automatically focus on the most important parts of an ECG record and handle noise by naturally exploiting expected consistency among the segments associated for each record. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method with 0.8125 F1NAOP score outperforms all state-of-the-art deep learning methods for AF detection task by 6.8%.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2019) studied Atrial Fibrillation. K-margin-based Residual-Convolution-Recurrent neural network (K-margin-based RCR-net) vs. State-of-the-art deep learning methods was evaluated on F1NAOP score (6.8% improvement). The K-margin-based Residual-Convolution-Recurrent neural network achieved an F1NAOP score of 0.8125, outperforming state-of-the-art deep learning methods for atrial fibrillation detection by 6.8%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: