Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term visual, refractive, and tomographic outcomes of a 360-degree intracorneal ring implant for treating keratoconus (KC). METHODS: This historical cohort study included 29 eyes of 29 patients with KC who underwent MyoRing implantation. Uncorrected and best-corrected distance visual acuity, refraction, keratometry, and corneal thickness were evaluated preoperatively and at 5 and 10 years postoperatively. RESULTS: Significant improvements were observed in all outcome measures at 5 and 10 years postoperatively compared with the preoperative values ( P < 0.001). Uncorrected distance visual acuity improved from 1.25 ± 0.34 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) preoperatively to 0.36 ± 0.24 logMAR at 5 years but showed regression to 0.48 ± 0.35 logMAR at 10 years. Corrected distance visual acuity similarly showed improvement from 0.50 ± 0.24 logMAR preoperatively to 0.18 ± 0.12 logMAR at 5 years, with some regression to 0.25 ± 0.22 logMAR at 10 years. Spherical equivalent improved from -9.38 ± 4.09 diopters (D) preoperatively to -2.70 ± 1.54 D at 5 years but regressed to -3.29 ± 2.22 D at 10 years. Although corneal flattening was observed at 5 years, a slight steepening trend was noted at 10 years. Corneal thickness exhibited an increase after 5 years ( P < 0.001), but this trend reversed by the 10-year mark. CONCLUSIONS: MyoRing implantation demonstrated significant initial improvements in visual, refractive, and tomographic outcomes in patients with KC; however, some regression toward preoperative values was observed by the 10-year follow-up. This highlights the importance of continued monitoring to assess the long-term impact of the implant and to manage any potential late effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khorrami‐Nejad et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: