Key result
Unstable angina shows similar 2-year MACE risk vs NSTEMI despite lower mortality.
Why the study?
It is unclear whether the detection of high-sensitivity troponin levels affects the prognosis of patients with unstable angina and NSTEMI, and whether a different therapeutic approach is warranted.
Does the diagnosis of NSTEMI versus unstable angina using high-sensitivity troponin assays predict different medium-term outcomes in patients with NSTEACS?
Cohort
Yes
Does the diagnosis of NSTEMI versus unstable angina using high-sensitivity troponin assays predict different medium-term outcomes in patients with NSTEACS?
Absolute Event Rate: 18.1% vs 18.9%
p-value: p=0.79
Despite similar rates of medium-term MACE, patients diagnosed with NSTEMI have significantly higher cardiovascular and all-cause mortality compared to those with unstable angina.
The introduction of high-sensitivity troponin (hsTn) assays has reduced the diagnosis of unstable angina (UA) in favor of non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) in the context of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS). It is unclear whether the detection of these hsTn levels affects the prognosis and therefore whether a different therapeutic approach is warranted. This study aims to determine whether using hsTn results in medium-term prognostic differences in patients with UA and NSTEMI. Methods: This multicenter, prospective registry study included consecutive patients who underwent hsTn assays and were discharged with a diagnosis of NSTEACS. Patients were followed for two years. Outcomes were the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and non-fatal ischemic stroke), major bleeding, and all-cause mortality. Results: Patients with UA and NSTEMI did not show differences in terms of the invasive interventions received, the coronary artery disease diagnosed, the type of revascularization performed, or the proportion presenting MACE (UA 18.1% vs. NSTEMI 18.9%; p = 0.79). However, patients with NSTEMI had higher cardiovascular mortality at two years (UA 4% vs. NSTEMI 9.2%; p = 0.012), as well as, all-cause mortality (UA vs. 7.9% vs. NSTEMI 16.4%; p = 0.002). Conclusions: Medium-term incidence of MACE was similar in patients with UA and NSTEMI, but cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in NSTEMI patients was over twice that of patients with UA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brocal et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS). Unstable angina (UA) vs. Non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and non-fatal ischemic stroke) (p=0.79). Unstable angina was associated with a similar two-year incidence of MACE compared to NSTEMI (18.1% vs. 18.9%; p=0.79), but significantly lower cardiovascular and all-cause mortality.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: