Key result
IV verapamil and diltiazem significantly attenuate ST alternans during acute coronary occlusion in dogs.
Why the study?
The effects of calcium antagonists on the electrical ST-segment alternans during acute coronary occlusion were not well characterized.
Do calcium antagonists attenuate ST segment alternans during acute coronary occlusion in dogs?
Do calcium antagonists attenuate ST segment alternans during acute coronary occlusion in dogs?
p-value: p=<0.05
Calcium antagonists verapamil and diltiazem attenuate ST segment alternans during acute coronary occlusion in a canine model, suggesting a protective effect against ischemic electrical instability.
May inform preclinical studies of calcium channel blockade in ischemia; leaves open translation to human acute coronary syndromes.
Effects of antagonists on the ST alternans during acute coronary occlusion were examined in dogs. The intravenous administration of verapamil at doses of 0.1 mg/Kg and 0.2 mg/Kg prominently attenuated the degree of alternans. Diltiazem at dose of 0.2 mg/Kg also attenuated the degree of alternans. Dipyridamole at dose of 0.5 mg/Kg did not significantly attenuate the degree of alternans. Verapamil significantly inhibited the ST-segment elevation. After verapamil, ST alternans did not occur even after a longer period of occlusion when changes in QRS complex and the ST-segment elevation were remarkable. It is possible that verapamil inhibits ST alternans by both the protecting effect against ischemic injury and a direct effect on the electrical activity of the myocardial cell membrane.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hashimoto et al. (1981) studied Acute coronary occlusion (myocardial ischemia) (n=29). Calcium antagonists (Verapamil, Diltiazem) vs. Control occlusion (baseline) was evaluated on Degree of ST alternans (p=<0.05). Intravenous administration of verapamil and diltiazem significantly attenuated the degree of ST alternans during acute coronary occlusion in dogs.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: