Key result
Master two-step test detects ischemic ST depression in ~61% of patients with coronary disease versus none in controls.
Why the study?
The diagnostic performance and criteria of the Master two-step test in patients with known coronary artery disease and normal persons required evaluation.
Does the Master two-step test accurately identify coronary insufficiency in patients with known coronary artery disease compared to normal persons?
Observational (n=294)
Does the Master two-step test accurately identify coronary insufficiency in patients with known coronary artery disease compared to normal persons?
Absolute Event Rate: 61.3% vs 0%
The Master two-step test provides useful diagnostic information for coronary insufficiency, with ischemic S-T segment depression being the most specific criterion, though using all criteria increases sensitivity at the cost of specificity.
ST depression alone shows high specificity in this cross-sectional analysis; leaves open prospective validation of Master's criteria against modern diagnostics.
The Master two-step test is a standardized exercise that permits the making of an electrocardiogram immediately after the activity terminates. The main criterion of the result is the behavior of the S-T segment of the tracing; depression of more than 0.5 mm. in any lead is considered a positive result. The test was applied to 186 patients known to have either angina pectoris or a healed myocardial infarction. By the criterion of ischemic S-T segment depression alone the test was positive in 61.3%; when Master's other criteria were also imposed, the test was positive in 81.7%. The test was applied further to 108 normal persons. By the criterion of ischemic S-T segment depression alone the test was negative in all; when Master's other criteria were also imposed, the test was positive in 19.4%. While a negative result does not exclude coronary insufficiency, a positive one strengthens the diagnosis of suspected coronary disease. Although the only conclusive evidence of coronary insufficiency is believed to be ischemic S-T segment depression, fewer cases escaped detection when all of Master's criteria were utilized. When sound clinical judgment is employed in conjunction with the test, overdiagnosis is infrequent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Henry I. Russek (1957) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease (n=294). Master two-step test vs. Normal persons was evaluated on Positive test result by ischemic S-T segment depression alone. The Master two-step test using ischemic S-T segment depression alone was positive in 61.3% of patients with known coronary disease and 0% of normal persons.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: