Key result
Vertebral heart score establishes reference cardiac size values averaging ~7.7 across radiographic views in healthy rats.
Why the study?
There is a lack of radiographic references for normal cardiac size in pet rats (Rattus norvegicus) to aid diagnosis of dilated cardiomyopathy.
Observational (n=124)
Blinded to signalment data
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study establishes normal radiographic reference intervals for the vertebral heart score in healthy rats, providing an objective tool for evaluating cardiac size in this species.
Dilated cardiomyopathy is a relatively common disease in pet rats (Rattus norvegicus); however, there is a lack of radiographic references for the normal cardiac size in this species. The aim of this prospective, anatomical and reference interval study was to establish quantitative radiographic reference range measurements for the vertebral heart score (VHS) in rats. Right lateral (RL), ventrodorsal (VD), and dorsoventral (DV) radiographs of clinically healthy rats (n = 124) were evaluated. Measurements were performed by 2 expert readers who were unaware of signalment data. The mean values and references intervals of VHS were 7.7 and 7.0-8.5 for the RL, 7.5 and 6.6-8.6 for the VD, and 7.9 and 6.9-9.0 for the DV, with VHS values greater in males than in females. The measurements reported in this study can be used by the clinician as an objective tool to evaluate cardiac size in rats, in order to improve the diagnosis and treatment of cardiac diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dias et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Healthy rats (Rattus norvegicus) (n=124). Vertebral heart score (VHS) measurement was evaluated on Vertebral heart score (VHS) mean values and reference intervals. Vertebral heart score evaluation in healthy rats established mean values of 7.7 (RL), 7.5 (VD), and 7.9 (DV), providing a quantitative radiographic reference range for cardiac size.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: