This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
This study examines the regime-dependent association between artificial intelligence investment (AIINV) and green growth (GGR) across business-cycle phases in OECD economies during 2012–2024. It investigates whether the AIINV–GGR relationship differs between boom and recession periods and whether AIINV is positively associated with the business cycle. Business-cycle conditions are identified using OECD and Hodrick–Prescott filter output gaps. The empirical analysis applies Augmented Mean Group and Common Correlated Effects Mean Group estimators within a pooled interaction framework, complemented by Wald tests. Results show that AIINV is positively associated with GGR during booms but negatively associated with GGR during recessions, while AIINV is positively associated with the output gap. Inflation and real interest rates have negative coefficients, whereas labour, physical capital, and human capital have positive coefficients. A fixed-T factor-proxy IV-GMM sensitivity analysis treats regime-specific AIINV interactions as endogenous and instruments them with their second and third lags. The GMM estimates reproduce the same directional pattern under both business-cycle classifications. However, weak recession-side instruments and residual cross-sectional dependence limit causal interpretation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: