Key result
CMR-based pulse wave velocity fails to independently predict prevalent infrarenal aortic ectasia or aneurysm.
Why the study?
Do CMR-based pulse wave velocity and aortic distensibility correlate with infrarenal ultrasound-based aortic parameters and predict abdominal aortic aneurysm in a general population cohort?
Cross-Sectional (n=2,093)
No
Do CMR-based pulse wave velocity and aortic distensibility correlate with infrarenal ultrasound-based aortic parameters and predict abdominal aortic aneurysm in a general population cohort?
CMR-based aortic stiffness parameters correlate with infrarenal aortic diameter and flow velocity but do not independently predict the presence of abdominal aortic ectasia or aneurysm.
BACKGROUND: Although pulse wave velocity (PWV) and aortic distensibility (AD) can be readily obtained from cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), there is a paucity of data on their use for screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and cardiovascular risk stratification. METHODS: Data from the Hamburg City Health Study (HCHS) were used: PWV, AD of the ascending (AD AoAsc) and descending aorta (AD AoDesc) were quantified using 2D-phase-contrast-velocity-encoding-CMR-sequences. The maximum diameter and peak flow velocity of the infrarenal aorta were quantified by ultrasound-measurements. Diameter thresholds for infrarenal ectasia (25-29 mm) and aneurysm (≥ 30 mm) were defined in accordance with current guidelines. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 2,093 participants (median age 66 years, 42% women). Median infrarenal aortic diameter was 18.1 mm [IQR 16.4, 19.9] and peak flow velocity 98.6 cm/s [IQR 83.6,115.9]. After adjustment for age and sex, there were significant associations of diameter with AD AoDesc (Coefficient -0.572 p = 0.009) and of peak flow velocity with PWV (Coefficient -0.399, p = 0.029). Participants with infrarenal ectasia or aneurysm (n = 55) had significantly higher median PWV, whereas AD AoAsc, AD AoDesc and peak flow velocity were significantly lower (p = 0.004, p = 0.042, p = 0.039, p < 0.001) compared with normal aortic diameter cohort. After adjustment for covariates, PWV and AD showed a significant predictive value neither for prevalent infrarenal ectasia or nor for aneurysm. CONCLUSION: CMR-based aortic stiffness parameters such as PWV and AD were associated with infrarenal aortic parameters. Their diagnostic, screening, and prognostic value remains to be investigated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Riedl et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Infrarenal aortic ectasia or aneurysm (n=2,093). CMR-based pulse wave velocity (PWV) vs. Normal infrarenal aortic diameter was evaluated on Prevalent infrarenal ectasia or aneurysm (OR 1.069, 95% CI 0.988-1.144, p=0.073). CMR-based pulse wave velocity was significantly higher in participants with infrarenal ectasia or aneurysm but did not significantly predict prevalent disease after covariate adjustment (OR 1.069).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: