Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Solubility behaviors of binary HFC-125 (CF 3 −CF 2 H), HFE-125 (CF 3 −O−CF 2 H), HFC-143a (CF 3 −CH 3 ), and HFE-143a (CF 3 −O−CH 3 ) systems with room-temperature ionic liquid 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide ([emim][Tf 2 N]) have been studied using a gravimetric microbalance method from (283 to 348) K and/or volumetric and cloud-point methods. Vapor–liquid equilibrium (VLE) data for HFC-125 + [emim][Tf 2 N] and HFE-125 + [emim][Tf 2 N] systems have been well correlated with our equation-of-state (EOS) model, which predicted vapor–liquid–liquid equilibria (VLLE) for both of these binary systems, and the VLLE have been experimentally proved. As for the binary systems of HFC-143a + [emim][Tf 2 N] and HFE-143a + [emim][Tf 2 N], only VLLE experiments have been made, and partial miscibility (temperature and composition: VLLE− Tx ) data are well correlated with the NRTL (nonrandom two-liquids) activity model. While the immiscibility gap of the HFC-125 binary system is smaller than that of the HFE-125 system, the immiscibility behaviors for the HFC-143a and HFE-143a systems are opposite; the HFE-143a system is more soluble.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shiflett et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: