Key result
Young, healthy short-term smokers exhibited a paradoxically greater maximal venodilation to bradykinin compared with nonsmokers (106% vs 69%; p < 0.05).
Why the study?
Does short-term smoking alter endothelium-dependent venodilation in response to bradykinin in young, healthy individuals?
Observational (n=22)
Does short-term smoking alter endothelium-dependent venodilation in response to bradykinin in young, healthy individuals?
Absolute Event Rate: 106% vs 69%
p-value: p=< 0.05
Young, healthy short-term smokers exhibit a paradoxically hyperactive endothelium-dependent venodilation response to bradykinin compared to nonsmokers.
Enhanced bradykinin venodilation in young smokers may reflect early compensation; leaves open relevance to long-term vascular risk.
Bradykinin is a nonapeptide, whose mechanism of vasodilation is mediated chiefly through the release of endothelium-derived relaxing factor (EDRF). Diminished vasodilatory response to EDRF has been demonstrated in many pathologic states such as hypertension, atherosclerosis, diabetes, and long-term, heavy smoking. We studied whether the diminished EDRF-mediated vasodilatory response seen in chronic diseases can be demonstrated in young, clinically healthy smokers. We used the dorsal hand-vein compliance technique, an in vivo technique used to measure response to local infusions of vasoactive substances. Full dose-response curves to bradykinin (dosing range, 0.5-500 ng/min) were generated in 11 young, healthy smokers and 11 young, healthy nonsmokers by using hand veins preconstricted with phenylephrine (dosing range, 20-6,800 ng/min). In addition, after a washout period, a single maximal dose of a non-endothelium-dependent vasodilator, isoproterenol (300 ng/min) was infused. Our results demonstrated that smokers had a greater maximal venodilation to bradykinin than did nonsmokers (106 +/- 40% vs. 69 +/- 49%; p < 0.05). The log of the dose that produced half-maximal response to bradykinin was smaller in smokers: -0.10 +/- 0.93 (0.79 ng/min) versus 0.75 +/- 0.84 (5.6 ng/min); p < 0.05. There was no difference in the maximal dilatory response to isoproterenol: 80 +/- 45% (smokers) versus 89 +/- 50% (nonsmokers), nor was there a difference in the log dose of phenylephrine necessary to produce 80% constriction of the hand vein (2.7 +/-0.7 vs. 2.7 +/- 0.9 ng/min) between the two groups. We conclude that young, otherwise healthy smokers have a paradoxic hyperactive response to the endothelium-dependent vasodilator, bradykinin, but maintain a similar response to the nonendothelium-dependent vasodilator, isoproterenol as compared with nonsmokers. Their reactivity to the alpha1-adrenergic agonist phenylephrine was found to be intact. It is possible that a hyperactive response to EDRF in young smokers contributes to endothelium damage seen in chronic disease. To our knowledge, this is the first report on increased reactivity to bradykinin in short-term smokers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vajó et al. (1999) conducted an observational in Healthy short-term smokers (n=22). Short-term smoking vs. Nonsmokers was evaluated on Maximal venodilation to bradykinin (p=< 0.05). Young, healthy short-term smokers exhibited a paradoxically greater maximal venodilation to bradykinin compared with nonsmokers (106% vs 69%; p < 0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: