Key result
Virtual reality cardiac rehab matches conventional therapy for autonomic modulation and accelerates recovery post-training.
Why the study?
The acute response of cardiac autonomic modulation during and after virtual reality-based therapy compared to conventional cardiovascular rehabilitation and the effects of 12 weeks of training were not well characterized.
Does virtual reality-based therapy alter the acute response of cardiac autonomic modulation compared to conventional cardiovascular rehabilitation?
RCT (n=28)
cluster-randomized crossover
Does virtual reality-based therapy alter the acute response of cardiac autonomic modulation compared to conventional cardiovascular rehabilitation?
Virtual reality-based therapy induces comparable acute cardiac autonomic modulation to conventional cardiovascular rehabilitation, with improved autonomic recovery observed after 12 weeks of training.
Supports VR-based therapy as alternative in cardiac rehab; confirms comparable acute autonomic effects with enhanced recovery.
Objective To assess the acute response of cardiac autonomic modulation (ACAM) during and after a session of virtual reality-based therapy (VRBT) compared to a session of conventional cardiovascular rehabilitation (CR) and to evaluate the effects of 12 weeks of training on this response.Methods We assessed 28 volunteers (63.4 ± 12.5 years). The ACAM was judged by linear indexes of heart rate variability (HRV) in VRBT and CR sessions. Later, patients completed 12 weeks of VRBT+CR and the assessment was repeated at the 12th week.Results Throughout the 1st VRBT session vagal withdrawal occurred (RMSSD/HFnu); sympathetic nervous system stimulation (LFnu) and progressive decrease of global HRV (SDNN). During the recovery, the SDNN, HFnu, and LFnu improved from the 5thminute on both therapies. After 12 weeks, the LFnu, HFnu, and the LF/HF-ratio revealed no significant changes in Ex3-Ex4 equated to Rep during VRBT. In recovery, the HFnu and LFnu improved before the 5thminute on both therapies.Conclusions ACAM during and after the VRBT was comparable to CR, yet, the extents were greater in the VRBT. After 12 weeks of VRBT training, the subjects adapted to the exercises from the 15thminute and exhibited faster recovery of HFnu and LFnu indexes compared to the 1st week.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silva et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Cardiovascular rehabilitation (n=28). Virtual reality-based therapy (VRBT) vs. Conventional cardiovascular rehabilitation (CR) was evaluated on Acute response of cardiac autonomic modulation (ACAM) judged by linear indexes of heart rate variability (HRV). Virtual reality-based therapy produced comparable acute cardiac autonomic modulation to conventional rehabilitation, with faster recovery of HFnu and LFnu indexes after 12 weeks of training.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: