Key result
Ischemic etiology is linked to ~18% lower 5-year survival vs degenerative MR after repair plus CABG.
Why the study?
The impact of mitral regurgitation etiology on mid-term outcomes after mitral valve repair and concomitant CABG was not well defined.
Does ischemic etiology compared to degenerative etiology worsen 5-year outcomes in patients undergoing mitral valve repair and concomitant CABG?
Cohort (n=111)
Does ischemic etiology compared to degenerative etiology worsen 5-year outcomes in patients undergoing mitral valve repair and concomitant CABG?
Ischemic mitral regurgitation is associated with significantly worse 5-year survival and event-free survival compared to degenerative etiology in patients undergoing mitral valve repair and CABG.
Etiology of mitral regurgitation may influence post-repair outcomes with CABG; leaves open whether ischemic versus degenerative etiology affects 5-year survival.
Aim of the study. To verify the impact of the etiology of mitral valve regurgitation on a 5-year outcome after repair and concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods. One hundred and eleven consecutive patients (mean age of 69±8 years) who underwent mitral valve repair, 65 for ischemic and 46 for degenerative mitral regurgitation, and concomitant CABG, were retrospectively analyzed. The mean follow-up was 40±28 (9-104) months. Five-year survival (including operative mortality), and survival free from events (postoperative low output syndrome, progression of mitral regurgitation, onset or worsening of congestive heart failure, recurrence of myocardial infarction, and the need for mitral valve replacement) were analyzed. Results. Compared with degenerative, ischemic mitral regurgitation was associated with a higher incidence of previous myocardial infarction (P<0.0001), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <0.45 (P<0.0001), and more diseased coronary vessels per patient (P<0.0001). Five-year all-cause mortality was 18% (20/111). Independent predictors of mortality were older age at operation (P=0.0008), LVEF<0.45 (P=0.04), and the ischemic etiology of mitral regurgitation (P=0.03). At five years, survival was 69%±7.6% for ischemic versus 87%±6.5% for degenerative etiology (P=0.03); event-free survival was 58%±8.4% versus 75%±8% (P=0.02), and freedom from late cardiac death was 85%±6.6% versus 100% (P=0.02). Freedom from mitral valve reoperation was 97±2.4%. Conclusions. Ischemic mitral regurgitation “per se” predicted limited survival and event-free survival. Left ventricular dysfunction is frequently associated with the ischemic etiology. An early surgical indication to prevent left ventricular dysfunction could be important to improve the mid-term outcome
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nardi et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in Ischemic or degenerative mitral regurgitation (n=111). Ischemic mitral regurgitation vs. Degenerative mitral regurgitation was evaluated on 5-year survival (p=0.03). Ischemic mitral regurgitation was associated with lower 5-year survival compared to degenerative etiology (69% vs 87%, P=0.03) following mitral valve repair and concomitant CABG.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: