Key result
Patient-specific 3D-printed flow phantom closely mirrors invasive stress testing with FFR of 0.78 vs. 0.76.
Why the study?
Anomalous aortic origin of coronary artery can lead to ischemia, and due to limitations of invasive catheterization dobutamine stress testing, a noninvasive alternative approach is desired.
Does a 3-dimensional-printed phantom accurately replicate invasive FFR and IVUS findings during stress in a patient with anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery?
Case Report (n=1)
Does a 3-dimensional-printed phantom accurately replicate invasive FFR and IVUS findings during stress in a patient with anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery?
A patient-specific 3D-printed phantom can accurately replicate invasive hemodynamic stress testing (FFR and IVUS) in anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery, offering a potential noninvasive evaluation method.
Anomalous aortic origin of coronary artery can lead to ischemia. Due to the limitations of invasive catheterization dobutamine stress testing, an alternative noninvasive approach is desired. A 65-year-old woman with atypical chest pain was referred for coronary computed tomography angiography. Although coronary artery disease was excluded, a right anomalous aortic origin of coronary artery with an interarterial and intramural course was discovered. The patient underwent invasive coronary angiography with a dobutamine stress test, which revealed a pathologic fractional flow reserve (ie, dobutamine fractional flow reserve) of 0.76 (normal >0.8) and lateral ostial compression in dobutamine intravascular ultrasound. A physical replication, using a patient-specific 3-dimensional-printed phantom was created based on coronary computed tomography angiography and evaluated in a flow loop under the same hemodynamic rest and stress conditions. The 3-dimensional-printed phantom fractional flow reserve was similar with 0.78, and dobutamine intravascular ultrasound showed comparable lateral compression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Illi et al. (2024) conducted a case report in Anomalous aortic origin of coronary artery (n=1). 3-dimensional-printed phantom evaluation in a flow loop vs. Invasive coronary angiography with dobutamine stress test was evaluated on Fractional flow reserve (FFR). A patient-specific 3-dimensional-printed phantom evaluated in a flow loop yielded a fractional flow reserve of 0.78, comparable to the invasive dobutamine stress test FFR of 0.76.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: