Key result
Active recovery following supramaximal exercise induced higher changes from baseline in heart rate (+29.1 vs +15.6 beats/min, P<0.05), stroke volume, and cardiac output compared to passive recovery.
Why the study?
Haemodynamic responses during active versus passive recovery following repeated supramaximal exercise bouts in athletes were not well characterized.
Does active recovery alter haemodynamic responses compared to passive recovery following supramaximal exercise in male athletes?
Does active recovery alter haemodynamic responses compared to passive recovery following supramaximal exercise in male athletes?
Active recovery after supramaximal exercise maintains higher cardiac output and stroke volume compared to passive recovery, though blood pressure is maintained in passive recovery via increased systemic vascular resistance.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Active recovery may sustain post-exercise haemodynamics in athletes; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
We aimed to investigate haemodynamics during active and passive recovery following repeated bouts of supramaximal exercise. Seven male athletes underwent two sessions of supramaximal exercise which consisted of a warm-up and of five bouts of cycling at the maximum speed possible for 30 s against a resistance equivalent to 150% of the maximum workload achieved in a previous incremental test. Bouts were separated by 1 min of recovery and followed by 10 min of recovery which was either active (pedalling at 40 W) or passive (completely rest seated on the cycle). Haemodynamic variables were evaluated by means of impedance cardiography. Heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), mean blood pressure (MBP), thoracic electrical impedance (Z0) as an inverse index of central blood volume, and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) were assessed. The main findings were that active recovery, with respect to passive recovery, induced higher changes from baseline in HR (+29.1 +/- 4.5 versus +15.6 +/- 2.9 beats min(-1) at the 10th minute of recovery, P < 0.05), SV (+19.9 +/- 5.6 versus -6.4 +/- 3.3 ml, P < 0.01) and CO (+3.8 +/- 1.2 versus +0.4 +/- 0.2 l min(-1), P < 0.01). Furthermore, MBP was similar between the two kinds of recovery despite an increase in Z0 during passive compared to active recovery. These results suggest that the faster haemodynamic recovery towards baseline and the decrease in cardiac preload during passive recovery may be successfully prevented by cardiovascular regulatory mechanisms which include an increase in SVR, thus avoiding a drop in blood pressure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Crisafulli et al. (2004) studied Athletes (n=7). Active recovery vs. Passive recovery was evaluated on Change from baseline in heart rate at the 10th minute of recovery (beats/min) (p=< 0.05). Active recovery following supramaximal exercise induced higher changes from baseline in heart rate (+29.1 vs +15.6 beats/min, P<0.05), stroke volume, and cardiac output compared to passive recovery.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: