Key result
Impella is feasible for cardiogenic shock during TAVR, but 30-day mortality remains ~40%.
Why the study?
Severe aortic stenosis is usually considered a contraindication to Impella implantation, but its role in supporting high-risk PCI or complicated TAVR remains to be clarified.
Is the Impella ventricular assist device feasible and effective for hemodynamic support in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing high-risk PCI or complicated TAVR?
Population
Patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing pre-TAVR high-risk PCI or cardiogenic shock during TAVR
Design
Review
Follow-up
30-day
Authors
Loading...
Feasibility in TAVR shock does not justify routine use; leaves open survival benefit pending prospective trials.
Is the Impella ventricular assist device feasible and effective for hemodynamic support in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing high-risk PCI or complicated TAVR?
Despite severe aortic stenosis traditionally being a contraindication, Impella may be a feasible option for hemodynamic support during pre-TAVR high-risk PCI or for cardiogenic shock complicating TAVR.
Tarantini et al. (2020) conducted a review in Severe aortic stenosis, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention, or cardiogenic shock during TAVR. Impella ventricular assist device was evaluated on 30-day mortality. Impella implantation was feasible for treating cardiogenic shock during TAVR, although 30-day mortality remained as high as 40%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: