To compare the clinical efficacy of erbium, chromium-doped yttrium scandium gallium garnet (Er, Cr: YSGG) laser versus conventional air-rotor handpiece for caries removal in primary teeth and their effects on children’s anxiety and pain levels, to provide evidence for optimizing pediatric dental treatment. A total of 90 children (aged 6–10 years) with primary tooth caries were enrolled. Using a split-mouth design, two carious teeth from each child were randomly assigned to air-rotor handpiece treatment (Group A, 90 teeth) or Er, Cr: YSGG laser treatment (Group B, 90 teeth). Clinical efficacy, restoration quality (United States Public Health Service [USPHS] criteria), masticatory function (bite force, chewing efficiency), adverse events, and children’s anxiety (Venham Anxiety and Behavior Rating Scale, Faces Image Scale [FIS], pulse rate) and pain levels (Wong-Baker FACES ® Pain Rating Scale) were compared. Group B exhibited significantly lower Venham scores, pulse rates, FIS scores, and Wong-Baker pain scores post-treatment ( P < 0.01). Additionally, no significant difference was observed in overall clinical efficacy (Group A 83.33% vs. Group B 91.11%, P = 0.18). However, Group B showed significantly better USPHS scores in sensitivity, secondary caries, and marginal staining ( P < 0.01), greater improvement in masticatory function ( P < 0.05) and a lower incidence of adverse events ( P = 0.01). Er, Cr: YSGG laser may represent an effective minimally invasive alternative for caries removal in primary teeth, particularly due to its potential benefits in reducing treatment-related pain and anxiety. Further long-term studies are required to confirm its effects on restoration longevity and clinical outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: