Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Tourists’ responses to the adoption and implementation of AI-based travel solutions have received considerable scholarly attention, yet investors’ reactions to such adoption decisions remain insufficiently understood. Drawing on multiple intelligences and tourism innovation archetypes theories, this study develops a conceptual framework that explains how AI adoption influences firm value and empirically tests this framework through a multi-method design combining event study analysis, propensity score matching, and sample selection modeling. Based on 903 corporate announcements, the findings reveal a positive effect of adoption of AI on firm value, that is contingent on the use of simplification and feelings-centered strategies. These moderating effects further vary according to firms’ labor efficiency and the prevalence of high-skill employees. The findings reveal a nuanced account of contingencies shaping AI adoption in tourism, travel, and hospitality contexts, which helps managers better understand how investors evaluate AI adoption strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Djavlonbek Kadirov (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: