The integration of wind energy, wave energy, and aquaculture on a shared floating platform can improve offshore space and infrastructure utilisation. Model-scale regular-wave experiments were conducted on a semi-submersible multi-use platform configured with different combinations of a simplified wind-turbine module, an oscillating water column (OWC) array, and flexible or rigid cage components. A comparative test matrix was used to separate draft effects from module induced and system-level responses. The prescribed steady thrust primarily altered the mean surge offset and mooring load distribution, whereas the changed mass distribution and rotational inertia associated with the wind-turbine module affected the wave-frequency responses. At T = 1.1 s, the maximum tension increase and mean tension variation of the windward line were 85.0% and 100.0% higher, respectively, after the wind turbine module was installed. The rigid perforated cage produced the largest response changes, amplifying the mooring-controlled low-frequency surge response and windward mooring loads. Compared with the rigid-cage configuration, the fully coupled OWC-integrated configuration exhibited 28.3%–57.1% lower heave responses and 18.7%–56.4% lower pitch responses. At the system level, the observed behaviour reflects the competition between cage-induced low-frequency load amplification and OWC-related motion mitigation. These findings clarify the coupled hydrodynamics of floating wind-wave-aquaculture systems and support the coordinated design of the cage, OWC, and mooring subsystems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: