Background Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into science education, yet the literature remains fragmented, lacking a unified framework that connects publication trends, curriculum implementation, and ethical considerations. Methods: A mixed-method systematic review was conducted that combined bibliometric analysis with qualitative content analysis. A total of 80 peer-reviewed studies were identified through Web of Science and Scopus databases (1990–2026) and analyzed using a structured coding scheme encompassing educational level, AI type, curriculum integration, ethical considerations, and pedagogical use. Results: Bibliometric analysis revealed an acceleration in publication growth since 2020, concentrated in higher education contexts. Qualitative analysis identified institutional and program-level integration as dominant (41%), while K-12 settings and teacher education remained underrepresented. Personalization and adaptive learning emerged as the main pedagogical application (59%), with transparency and student agency as the leading ethical concerns. Privacy, governance, and equity dimensions were critically underrepresented. Conclusion: The findings reveal structural imbalances and ethical gaps in the current integration of AI in science education. A multidimensional analytical framework is proposed, capturing the interdependencies between technological, pedagogical, and ethical dimensions. Future research should prioritize K-12 contexts, data governance, and systemic policy frameworks to support responsible AI integration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zsolt Molnár (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: