As Artificial Intelligence (AI) reshapes teaching, learning, and administration, educators face pedagogical, ethical, and professional challenges. This study maps the structure, themes, and research trends of AI-in-education scholarship using bibliometric and quantitative content analysis. Using the PRISMA protocol for search and screening, 208 peer-reviewed articles from the Scopus database, published between 2021 and 2025, were retrieved, and analysed using Biblioshiny (Bibliometrix 5.5.0; R 4.6.1) and VOSviewer 1.6.21. The field is expanding rapidly, with 8 articles in 2021 and 106 in 2025 (90.79% annual growth rate). Science mapping (keyword co-occurrence, bibliographic coupling, and co-citation) indicates that the field is grounded in technology-acceptance and self-efficacy theory, and features convergence around generative AI, AI literacy, and ethical application. A thematic map places educational technology and ChatGPT among motor themes and generative AI among emerging themes. A complementary content analysis of all 208 articles yields six thematic categories, the largest being students’ AI literacy, perceptions, and learning with AI tools (25.0%), AI in health-professions and other disciplinary education (21.2%), and human–AI learning frameworks (19.2%). Ethics and responsible-AI terms appear in about 40% of the articles, adoption terms in 30%, and educator-preparedness terms in 36%. The results indicate that responsible AI use is a prominent strand of the field, and give guidelines for policy, institutional leadership, faculty development and future research. The findings inform AI-in-education scholarship and educational policy aligned with United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 4 (SDG 4).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mushir et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: