Key result
Inoperable CTEPH is linked to lower 3-year survival at ~86% versus ~94% in IPAH.
Why the study?
A complex analysis of clinical, functional, hemodynamics profiles, medical treatment, and prognosis in inoperable CTEPH compared to IPAH patients was needed according to the Russian registry.
Cohort (n=346)
Yes
Inoperable CTEPH patients in the Russian registry presented with more severe functional and hemodynamic status but had higher 5-year survival compared to IPAH patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Inoperable CTEPH patients present older and more severe than IPAH yet show higher 5-year survival on dual therapy; leaves open optimal strategies in observational data.
AIM: to perform the complex analysis of clinical, functional, hemodynamics profile in patients with inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) compared to the idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH) group at the time of diagnosis verification according to the Russian registry, and to evaluate the features of medical therapy and it's influence on prognosis in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the retrospective study 193 patients with IPAH and 130 patients with inoperable CTEPH older than 18 years were included. All included patients were the participants of Russian registry (www.medibase.pro) in 15 Russian expert centers during the period from 01.01.2012 to 31.12.2018 year. The diagnosis was verified according to the algorithm, reflected in the Russian guidelines on diagnosis and treatment of PH and CTEPH (2016 year). The comparison analysis of clinical, functional, hemodynamics parameters in patients with IPAH and inoperable CTEPH was made. RESULTS: The status of 193 patients with IPAH (32 male and 162 female) and 130 patients with inoperable CTEPH - (40 male and 90 female) was analyzed during the study. The CTEPH patients were older compared to the IPAH patients: 52.2 [41.1; 60.6] and 36.5 [26.8; 36.5] years, respectively. The median period since symptom occurrence till CTEPH verification was 1.08 [0.2; 3.1] years, in IPAH patients - 2.01 [0.6; 4.2] years. More than 80% of inoperable CTEPH patients had III and IV functional class (FC) according to the World Health Organization classification at the time of diagnosis verification versus 61% of IPAH patients. According to echocardiography the level of mean pulmonary arterial pressure was comparable in two groups of PH patients. However in inoperable CTEPH patients the right atrial area was larger. The significantly higher value of mean pulmonary arterial pressure and lower value oxygen saturation of arterial blood according to the right heart catheterization were revealed. The 5-year survival in CTEPH patients, receiving initial dual combination therapy in 75% cases (in 40% - combination of riociguat and iloprost ) was 93% versus 86.5% in patients with IPAH. CONCLUSION: It was revealed, that inoperable CTEPH patients were significantly older with severe functional and hemodynamics status at the time of diagnosis verification, although with higher level of 5-year survival compared to the IPAH patients according to the Russian registry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chazova et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension and idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (n=346). Inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension vs. Idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension was evaluated on 3-year survival. Patients with inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension were older and had more severe functional status at diagnosis compared to those with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension, with a 3-year survival rate of.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: