Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Several mathematical approaches for quantifying the three-dimensional topographical structure from scanning probe microscopy images are evaluated. Variational, i.e., scale-dependent, roughness based on root-mean-square roughness, Fourier deconvolution, and the two-dimensional autocovariance function are compared for surfaces with widely varying character in order to develop criteria for accurate quantification. Thermally evaporated gold, a calibration grid, polycrystalline Si3N4, and silicon fracture surfaces serve as models for these techniques. The role of image artifacts on each approach is detailed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kiely et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: