Key result
Subject-independent affective decoding using fNIRS achieved significant balanced accuracies for discriminating positive vs. negative (64.50%) and negative vs. neutral (68.25%) states (p<0.01).
Why the study?
Does subject-independent affective decoding using fNIRS accurately classify emotional states in human participants?
Observational (n=69)
Does subject-independent affective decoding using fNIRS accurately classify emotional states in human participants?
p-value: p=<0.01
fNIRS is a viable technique for subject-independent affective decoding, achieving significant classification accuracies of emotional states using a few biologically relevant features.
Affective decoding is the inference of human emotional states using brain signal measurements. This approach is crucial to develop new therapeutic approaches for psychiatric rehabilitation, such as affective neurofeedback protocols. To reduce the training duration and optimize the clinical outputs, an ideal clinical neurofeedback could be trained using data from an independent group of volunteers before being used by new patients. Here, we investigated if this subject-independent design of affective decoding can be achieved using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) signals from frontal and occipital areas. For this purpose, a linear discriminant analysis classifier was first trained in a dataset (49 participants, 24.65±3.23 years) and then tested in a completely independent one (20 participants, 24.00±3.92 years). Significant balanced accuracies between classes were found for positive vs. negative (64.50 ± 12.03%, p<0.01) and negative vs. neutral (68.25 ± 12.97%, p<0.01) affective states discrimination during a reactive block consisting in viewing affective-loaded images. For an active block, in which volunteers were instructed to recollect personal affective experiences, significant accuracy was found for positive vs. neutral affect classification (71.25 ± 18.02%, p<0.01). In this last case, only three fNIRS channels were enough to discriminate between neutral and positive affective states. Although more research is needed, for example focusing on better combinations of features and classifiers, our results highlight fNIRS as a possible technique for subject-independent affective decoding, reaching significant classification accuracies of emotional states using only a few but biologically relevant features.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Trambaiolli et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Affective states (n=69). Subject-independent affective decoding using fNIRS was evaluated on Balanced accuracy for positive vs. negative affective states discrimination (p=<0.01). Subject-independent affective decoding using fNIRS achieved significant balanced accuracies for discriminating positive vs. negative (64.50%) and negative vs. neutral (68.25%) states (p<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: