Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A CTLp recognizing another cell, called veto cell, is suppressed by that veto cell. The veto cell can itself be a CTL. For the veto function, the TCR of the veto cell is not required, hence the veto function is a backward action of CTL. Since, from the point of view of the veto cell, only self-reactive CTLp are suppressed, the veto function could be a mechanism for maintaining self tolerance of CTL. The characteristics of veto function in vitro and in vivo are discussed, as well as the potential physiological relevance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hans‐Georg Rammensee (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: