Key result
Greater rurality, fewer healthcare providers, and digital exclusion were significantly associated with higher coronary heart disease prevalence and mortality across 418 Deep South counties.
Why the study?
Rural counties in the Deep South experience disproportionately high cardiovascular disease burdens, and the relationships between healthcare access, telehealth readiness, and CHD outcomes require examination.
Observational (n=418)
Yes
Digital exclusion and healthcare provider shortages are significantly associated with higher coronary heart disease prevalence and mortality in the Deep South.
May inform targeted resource allocation in rural Deep South counties; leaves open whether addressing these factors reduces CHD mortality.
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease remains a leading cause of preventable mortality in the United States, with rural counties in the Deep South experiencing disproportionately high burdens. Grounded in the Andersen healthcare utilization model, this study examined how enabling resources, predisposing characteristics, and access-related barriers relate to coronary heart disease (CHD) prevalence and mortality. METHODS: This ecological analysis included 418 counties across Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, and South Carolina. Using Local Indicators of Spatial Association (LISA) and multivariable linear regression, we tested three theory-based hypotheses and assessed the spatial clustering of CHD outcomes, while identifying key structural and sociodemographic predictors. RESULTS: Counties with greater rurality and fewer healthcare providers exhibited significantly higher rates of CHD prevalence and mortality. Primary care provider availability and higher household income were protective factors. Digital exclusion, measured by lack of access to computers or mobile devices, was significantly associated with higher CHD prevalence and mortality. Spatial analysis identified the counties with better-than-expected cardiovascular outcomes despite structural disadvantages, suggesting the potential role of localized resilience factors and unmeasured community-level interventions. CONCLUSIONS: The findings affirm the relevance of the Andersen model for understanding rural health disparities and highlight the importance of investing in both digital infrastructure and healthcare capacity. Expanding telehealth without addressing provider shortages and social determinants may be insufficient. Local policy innovations and community resilience mechanisms may offer scalable models for improving cardiovascular health in disadvantaged areas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Juboori et al. (2025) conducted an observational in coronary heart disease (CHD) (n=418). Rurality, healthcare access barriers, and digital exclusion was evaluated on coronary heart disease (CHD) prevalence and mortality. Greater rurality, fewer healthcare providers, and digital exclusion were significantly associated with higher coronary heart disease prevalence and mortality across 418 Deep South counties.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: