Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective To evaluate the sedative effects of intramuscular (IM) alfaxalone 4% combined with butorphanol or dexmedetomidine in healthy dogs. Study Design Experimental, randomized, blinded, crossover study. Animals A total of six healthy adult dogs of mixed breeds. Methods Alfaxalone 4% (3 mg kg -1 ) was combined with either butorphanol 0.4 mg kg -1 or dexmedetomidine 5 μg kg -1 injected IM, with a minimum three-day washout. Sedation variables (onset, duration, quality including composite scoring, onset, and recovery), cardiorespiratory variables [heart rate (HR), respiratory rate ( f R ), oxygen saturation of haemoglobin (SpO 2 ), mean arterial pressure (MAP)], and response to cephalic venous catheterization [on a 4-point scale (0–3)] were recorded. Data are shown as median & interquartile range or mean ± standard deviation, p < 0.05. Results All dogs achieved sedation with good to excellent recovery [scores: alfaxalone-butorphanol 3.5 (3.25–4), alfaxalone-dexmedetomidine 4 (4–4)]. Duration of sedation was 88.9 ± 63.7 minutes and 95.8 ± 43.7 minutes ( p = 0.831), and quality of sedation was 21 (19–22) and 22 (18–25.5) out of 27 ( p = 0.249). Catheter placement was successful in all dogs with minimal resistance [scores 3 (3–3)]. HRs decreased from baseline in both groups: alfaxalone-butorphanol (110 ± 30 to 63 ± 12 beats minute -1 ; p = 0.003) and alfaxalone-dexmedetomidine (99 ± 16 to 59 ± 15 beats minute -1 ; p = 0.001). f Rs decreased from baseline with alfaxalone-butorphanol (25 ± 3 to 18 ± 5 breaths minute -1 ; p = 0.031). Mild hypoxaemia (SpO 2 90–94%) occurred in both groups: alfaxalone-butorphanol (3/6), alfaxalone-dexmedetomidine (5/6). MAPs were higher following alfaxalone-dexmedetomidine than alfaxalone-butorphanol (MAP 104 ± 13 mmHg; 79 ± 8mmHg respectively) ( p ≤ 0.020). Conclusions and clinical relevance IM alfaxalone 4% at 3 mg kg -1 combined with butorphanol or dexmedetomidine provided sufficient sedation for IV catheterization. Supplemental oxygen is recommended with both protocols.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hoon et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: