Why the study?
Out-of-office blood pressure measurement is recommended by international guidelines but the practice and uptake among physicians in Singapore were unclear.
Cross-Sectional (n=60)
While Singaporean physicians frequently recommend out-of-office blood pressure monitoring, significant gaps exist between their clinical practice and current guideline recommendations regarding measurement protocols and patient education.
Reveals gaps in ambulatory BP monitoring uptake; leaves open whether targeted education improves guideline adherence.
PURPOSE: Out-of-office blood pressure (BP) measurements (home blood pressure monitoring [HBPM] and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring [ABPM]) provide important additional information for effective hypertension detection and management decisions. Therefore, out-of-office BP measurement is now recommended by several international guidelines. This study evaluated the practice and uptake of HBPM and ABPM among physicians from Singapore. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A sample of physicians from Singapore was surveyed between 8 September and 5 October 2016. Those included were in public or private practice had been practicing for ≥3 years, directly cared for patients ≥70% of the time, and treated ≥30 patients for hypertension per month. The questionnaire covered six main categories: general BP management, BP variability (BPV) awareness/diagnosis, HBPM, ABPM, BPV management, and associated training needs. RESULTS: Sixty physicians (30 general practitioners, 20 cardiologists, and 10 nephrologists) were included (77% male, 85% aged 31-60 years, and mean 22-year practice). Physicians recommended HBPM and ABPM to 81% and 27% of hypertensive patients, respectively. HBPM was most often used to monitor antihypertensive therapy (88% of physicians) and 97% thought that ABPM was useful for providing information on BPV. HBPM instructions often differed from current guideline recommendations in terms of frequency, number of measurements, and timing. The proportion of consultation time devoted to discussing HBPM and BPV was one-quarter or less for 73% of physicians, and only 55% said that they had the ability to provide education on HBPM and BPV. Patient inertia, poor patient compliance, lack of medical consultation time, and poor patient access to a BP machine were the most common challenges for implementing out-of-office BP monitoring. CONCLUSION: Although physicians from Singapore do recommend out-of-office BP measurement to patients with hypertension, this survey identified several important gaps in knowledge and clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Setia et al. (2017) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertension (n=60). Out-of-office blood pressure monitoring (HBPM and ABPM) was evaluated on Practice and uptake of HBPM and ABPM. A survey of 60 physicians in Singapore found that home and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring were recommended to 81% and 27% of hypertensive patients, respectively, highlighting practice gaps.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: