Key result
A survey of 60 physicians in Singapore identified gaps in blood pressure variability management, with 48% not adhering to HBPM diagnostic cutoffs and 82% lacking specific training.
Cross-Sectional (n=60)
There are significant gaps in knowledge and guideline adherence regarding blood pressure variability assessment and management among physicians in Singapore.
Survey indicates most physicians include white-coat hypertension in BPV; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
PURPOSE: There are limited data on blood pressure variability (BPV) in Singapore. The absence of updated local guidelines might contribute to variations in diagnosis, treatment and control of hypertension and BPV between physicians. This study evaluated BPV awareness, hypertension management and associated training needs in physicians from Singapore. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Physicians from Singapore were surveyed between September 8, 2016, and October 5, 2016. Those included were in public or private practice for ≥3 years, cared directly for patients ≥70% of the time and treated ≥30 patients for hypertension each month. The questionnaire covered 6 main categories: general blood pressure (BP) management, BPV awareness/diagnosis, home BP monitoring (HBPM), ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), BPV management and associated training needs. RESULTS: Responses from 60 physicians (30 general practitioners [GPs], 20 cardiologists, 10 nephrologists) were analyzed (77% male, 85% aged 31-60 years, mean 22 years of practice). Approximately 63% of physicians considered white-coat hypertension as part of BPV. The most common diagnostic tool was HBPM (overall 77%, GPs 63%, cardiologists 65%, nephrologists 70%), but ABPM was rated as the tool most valued by physicians (80% overall), especially specialists (97%). Withdrawn Singapore guidelines were still being used by 73% of GPs. Approximately 48% of physicians surveyed did not adhere to the BP cutoff recommended by most guidelines for diagnosing hypertension using HBPM (>135/85 mmHg). Hypertension treatment practices also varied from available guideline recommendations, although physicians did tend to use a lower BP target for patients with diabetes or kidney disease. There were a number of challenges to estimating BPV, the most common of which was patient refusal of ABPM/HBPM. The majority of physicians (82%) had no training on BPV, but stated that this would be useful. CONCLUSION: There appear to be gaps in knowledge and guideline adherence relating to the assessment and management of BPV among physicians in Singapore.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Setia et al. (2017) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertension and blood pressure variability (n=60). Survey on blood pressure variability management was evaluated on Blood pressure variability awareness, hypertension management and associated training needs. A survey of 60 physicians in Singapore identified gaps in blood pressure variability management, with 48% not adhering to HBPM diagnostic cutoffs and 82% lacking specific training.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: