PulseExploreJournal ClubResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeJournal ClubExplore
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 11, 2023Hypertension ResearchOpen Access

Current realities of home blood pressure monitoring from physicians’ perspectives: results from Asia HBPM survey 2020

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

Uncontrolled hypertension is a significant problem in Asia, and experts conceptualized a large-scale survey to examine the current realities of home blood pressure monitoring.

Population

7945 physicians across 11 countries/regions in Asia

Design

Cross-sectional survey

Key result

Although 95.9% of surveyed physicians in Asia recommend home blood pressure monitoring, only 22.4% cited diagnostic thresholds consistent with guidelines.

Authors

TWTzung‐Dau WangTOTakayoshi OhkuboMBMa Lourdes Bunyi

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

May warrant targeted education on home BP thresholds for Asian physicians; leaves open whether interventions improve guideline concordance.

Study Design

Type

Cross-Sectional (n=7,945)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

P
Population
7,945 physicians from 11 Asian countries/regions surveyed to assess their perspectives, recognition, and clinical practices regarding home blood pressure monitoring.
E
Exposure
Survey on current realities and practices of home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM)
O
Outcome
Physicians' perspectives, recognition, barriers, and practices regarding home blood pressure monitoring

Despite high recommendation rates for home blood pressure monitoring among Asian physicians, there are significant gaps in guideline-concordant knowledge regarding diagnostic thresholds and medication timing.

Limitations

  • Most respondents were general practitioners or internal medicine physicians, which may limit generalizability to other specialties.
  • The survey did not capture patients' perspectives directly.
  • Differences in healthcare systems and specialties between countries/regions could influence responses.
  • Selection bias due to sampling through professional societies and seminars rather than national representative sampling.
  • Minor differences in survey design for some countries may limit comparability.
  • Potential social desirability bias in physician responses.

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertension (n=7,945). Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) practices was evaluated on Physician recognition, recommendation rates, and knowledge of HBPM guidelines. Although 95.9% of surveyed physicians in Asia recommend home blood pressure monitoring, only 22.4% cited diagnostic thresholds consistent with guidelines.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa44e3394dbd26bf221022fhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-023-01259-1
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Insights on home blood pressure monitoring in Asia: Expert perspectives from 10 countries/regions2020 · 12 citations
  2. 2Awareness and recommendation of home blood pressure measurement among physicians in India: Results from Asia HBPM survey 20202023 · 5 citations
  3. 3Physicians' awareness and practice of home blood pressure measurement in Indonesia: Asia home blood pressure monitoring survey 20202023
  4. 4Guidance on home blood pressure monitoring: A statement of the <scp>HOPE</scp> Asia Network2018 · 69 citations
  5. 5Current status of home blood pressure monitoring in Asia: Statement from the <scp>HOPE</scp> Asia Network2017 · 80 citations