Key result
Cluster analysis reveals nine distinct health locus of control profiles in heart failure patients.
Why the study?
Different patterns of health locus of control in patients with chronic heart failure may be relevant for targeted education and self-management support.
Cross-Sectional (n=758)
Yes
Patients with heart failure exhibit significant variability in their health locus of control, suggesting that personalized educational approaches based on belief clusters may improve self-management.
Background and Objectives: The assumption of responsibility in dealing with chronic diseases is of relevance in a resource-oriented and not only deficit-oriented medicine, especially in dealing with chronic diseases, including patients with chronic heart failure. The aim of the present study is to examine, based on the model of “locus of control”, whether there are different patterns that would be relevant for a more targeted education and support of self-management in dealing with heart failure. Materials and Methods: For this purpose, a sample (n = 758) from 11 Polish cardiology centers have been assessed using the standardized self-assessment scale Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC), consisting of three dimensions: (i) internal localization of health control; (ii) external control by powerful others; (iii) external control by chance. Results: Using these three criteria, nine different clusters were extracted (mean size: 84 ± 33 patients, min 31, max 129). Three clusters included over 100 patients, whereas only two included less than 50 people. Only one cluster gathered 42 patients who will be able to cooperate with professionals in the most fruitful way. There were two clusters, including patients with beliefs related to the risk of ignoring professional recommendations. Clusters where patients declared beliefs about others’ control with low internal control should also be provided with specific help. Conclusions: The division into clusters revealed significant variability of belief structures about health locus of control within the analyzed group. The presented methodological approach may help adjust education and motivation to a selected constellation of beliefs as a compromise between group-oriented vs. individual approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Siennicka et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Systolic heart failure (n=758). Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC) patterns was evaluated on Identification of clusters based on MHLC dimensions (internal, external by others, external by chance). Clustering analysis of health locus of control beliefs in heart failure patients identified nine distinct clusters, revealing significant variability in belief structures that could inform personalized educational interventions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: