Key result
VF Therapy Assurance delivers new or earlier appropriate shocks in ~0.3% of devices.
Why the study?
Traditional implantable cardioverter-defibrillator algorithms may fail to identify ventricular tachyarrhythmias with low and varying signal amplitudes and morphologies.
Does the VFTA algorithm improve the detection and timely delivery of high-voltage therapy for ventricular tachyarrhythmias compared to traditional algorithms?
Observational (n=20,000)
Does the VFTA algorithm improve the detection and timely delivery of high-voltage therapy for ventricular tachyarrhythmias compared to traditional algorithms?
The VFTA algorithm successfully identifies undertreated life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias missed by traditional detection algorithms, potentially increasing the delivery of life-saving high-voltage therapy.
May aid VTA detection in challenging ICD cases; leaves open clinical outcomes pending prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTA) with low and varying signal amplitudes and morphologies may not be successfully identified utilizing traditional implantable cardioverter-defibrillator algorithms. OBJECTIVE: Develop and validate a novel algorithm (VF Therapy Assurance, VFTA) to improve detection and timely delivery of high-voltage therapy (HVT) for these arrhythmias. METHODS: Arrhythmia detection was simulated on recorded VTA electrograms (EGMs) utilizing Abbott's Merlin.net database. EGMs where an HVT occurred only when VFTA was enabled, or where VFTA provided an HVT >30 seconds earlier than without VFTA, were readjudicated with physician review. As VFTA never prevents detection or therapy, EGMs where VFTA did not activate or alter HVT were not adjudicated. RESULTS: Among 564,353 recorded VTA EGMs from 20,000 devices, VFTA altered HVT in 105 EGMs from 67 devices. Physician adjudication determined that 81.9% (86/105) of these EGMs were true undertreated VTA episodes and would have received appropriate HVT with VFTA enabled. Furthermore, 65% of the episodes (56/86) were ventricular fibrillation, were polymorphic, did not self-terminate during the recording window, or were not amenable antitachycardia pacing. Of those, 87.5% (49/56) would not have elicited HVT without VFTA. Overall, VFTA provided new or earlier appropriate HVT in 0.27% (53/20,000) of devices with an increase in inappropriate HVT in 0.07% (14/20,000) devices. CONCLUSION: The VFTA algorithm successfully identifies VTA missed by traditional detection algorithms, owing to undersensed ventricular signals resulting in the rate falling below the programmed detection rate. The use of VFTA increases the likelihood of delivering life-saving HVT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wilkoff et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Ventricular tachyarrhythmias (n=20,000). VF Therapy Assurance (VFTA) algorithm vs. Traditional detection algorithms was evaluated on New or earlier appropriate high-voltage therapy. The VF Therapy Assurance algorithm provided new or earlier appropriate high-voltage therapy in 0.27% of devices, with an increase in inappropriate therapy in 0.07% of devices.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: