Key result
Frailty in type 2 diabetes is linked to ~86% higher all-cause mortality.
Why the study?
The association of frailty with congestive heart failure, all-cause, and cardiovascular mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus has not been thoroughly explored.
Does a higher frailty index increase the risk of congestive heart failure and mortality in adults with type 2 diabetes?
Cohort (n=2,894)
Does a higher frailty index increase the risk of congestive heart failure and mortality in adults with type 2 diabetes?
Hazard Ratio: 1.86 (95% CI 1.55–2.24)
p-value: p=<0.0001
Frailty is a significant independent predictor of congestive heart failure and both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Supports frailty screening for mortality risk stratification in type 2 diabetes; leaves open whether modification alters outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Both type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and frailty are strongly associated with congestive heart failure (CHF). Individuals with T2DM and CHF have a high frailty burden. The association of frailty with HF, all-cause, and cardiovascular mortality in patients with T2DM has not been thoroughly explored. METHODS: This study included 2894 adults with T2DM from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database over ten cycles (1999-2018) and followed up for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality through 31 December 2019. The frailty index (FI) was calculated using a 46-item deficit model to assess frailty status. Weighted multivariable logistic regression was performed to explore the relationship between frailty and CHF in patients with T2DM. Weighted restricted cubic splines were used to evaluate the non-linear relationship between FI and outcome. All-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality association with FI was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier curve and COX proportional hazards regression accounting for sampling weights. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the robustness of the results. RESULTS: After the adjustment of essential confounders, a higher frailty index in T2DM was associated with increased odds of CHF (odds ratio [OR] for per 1-SD increase, 2.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.67-2.45; P < 0.0001). The presence of frailty T2DM (OR, 3.60; 95% CI 2.34-5.54; P < 0.0001) was associated with a significant increase in the prevalence of CHF compared to non-frailty T2DM in a fully adjusted model. During the median follow-up of 6.75 years, per 1-SD increase in FI was associated with a 41% higher risk of all-cause mortality and a 30% higher risk of cardiovascular mortality after being adjusted for all confounders. Similar results were observed when sensitivity analyses were performed. There was also a non-linear relationship between FI and all-cause mortality. In a weighted multivariate COX proportional model adjusted for full confounders, frailty T2DM increased all-cause (HR, 1.86; 95% CI 1.55-2.24; P < 0.0001) and cardiovascular (HR 1.66; 95% CI 1.18-2.33; P = 0.003) mortality and compared to non-frailty T2DM. The positive association of frailty index and all-cause mortality was only in participants without CHF. The positive association of frailty index and cardiovascular mortality was only in non-anti-diabetic drug users. CONCLUSIONS: Frailty index in T2DM was positively associated with CHF in linear fashions. The Frailty index was positively correlated with all-cause and cardiovascular death in patients with T2DM. Frailty T2DM was positively associated with CHF, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular mortality compared to non-frailty T2DM. Promoting frailty measurement and management in T2DM may be beneficial to reduce the burden of CHF and mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qin et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Type 2 diabetes (n=2,894). Frailty vs. Non-frailty was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 1.86, 95% CI 1.55-2.24, p=<0.0001). In adults with type 2 diabetes, the presence of frailty was associated with an 86% increased risk of all-cause mortality compared to non-frail individuals (HR 1.86).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: