Key result
Advanced CKD is linked to ~56% lower cardioversion success with antazoline for recent-onset AF.
Why the study?
The influence of chronic kidney disease on the effectiveness and safety of pharmacological cardioversion in recent-onset atrial fibrillation patients was unclear.
Does chronic kidney disease stage affect the effectiveness and safety of pharmacological cardioversion drugs in patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=777)
Yes
Does chronic kidney disease stage affect the effectiveness and safety of pharmacological cardioversion drugs in patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 35% vs 79.1%
p-value: p=<0.001
In patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation and advanced chronic kidney disease, propafenone and amiodarone maintain cardioversion efficacy, whereas antazoline becomes significantly less effective.
Reduced antazoline efficacy in advanced CKD warrants caution; leaves open optimal agent selection for recent-onset AF.
Pharmacological cardioversion (PCV) is commonly a primary option for termination of recent-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) in emergency departments (ED). This is a subanalysis of the CANT II study, evaluating the effectiveness and safety of antazoline in patients (n = 777) at three stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD): Group I > 60 mL/min (n = 531), Group II 45−59 mL/min (n = 149), and Group III < 45 mL/min (n = 97). Patients in Group III were older and with a higher prevalence of co-morbidities; however, we did not find statistically significant differences in the overall effectiveness of PCV in comparison with the other groups. In patients receiving amiodarone, the PCV success rate was similar in all the studied groups, but along with a renal function decline, it decreased in patients receiving antazoline (79.1 vs. 35%; p < 0.001), and it increased almost significantly in patients receiving propafenone (69.9 vs. 100%; p = 0.067). In patients in Group I, antazoline restored a sinus rhythm as effectively as propafenone and amiodarone; however, in patients in Group III, both antazoline and amiodarone became less effective in restoring a sinus rhythm than propafenone (p = 0.002 and p = 0.034, respectively). The rate of safety endpoint was the highest in patients in Group III (eGFR < 45 mL/min), and it was significantly higher than in patients in Groups I and II (p = 0.008 and p = 0.036, respectively). We did not observe antazoline-related adverse events in any of the studied groups of patients. This real-world registry analysis revealed a different influence of CKD on the effectiveness of individual drugs, and while propafenone and amiodarone maintained their AF termination efficacy, antazoline became significantly less effective in restoring sinus rhythm.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ceynowa-Sielawko et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Recent-onset atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease (n=777). Antazoline vs. Amiodarone, Propafenone, or overlapping therapy was evaluated on Termination of AF and restoration of a sinus rhythm persisting until discharge (p=<0.001). The efficacy of pharmacological cardioversion with antazoline for recent-onset atrial fibrillation significantly decreased from 79.1% in patients with normal renal function to 35% in those with advanced chronic kidney disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: