Key result
Decreased LVEF is linked to ~54% lower regional contraction work on ECG-gated SPECT.
Why the study?
Regional contraction work of the left ventricle was evaluated from ECG-gated SPECT images using a fluid mechanics-based thin wall model to improve assessment of cardiac mechanical work.
Cross-Sectional (n=29)
Regional contraction work calculated from ECG-gated SPECT images can differentiate between normal subjects and patients with severely reduced ejection fraction, and correlates poorly with regional contraction amplitude.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Differentiates severe systolic dysfunction on gated SPECT; hypothesis-generating for incremental value over LVEF in prospective studies.
Regional contraction work (RCW) of left ventricle (LV) was evaluated from cardiac perfusion images of ECG-gated single photon emission computed tomography (ECG-SPECT). The mechanical work was computed as a product of force and displaced distance. Force was determined from Laplace's law under a rectangle pressure. Deformation of wireframe representing LV was calculated from equations of continuity for two-dimensional fluids. Experiments were performed with homemade life-sized cardiac models. Total contraction work (TCW) and stroke work (SW) were 524.0 ± 166.1 mJ/beat and 709.8 ± 169.5 mJ/beat, respectively, in normal subjects (n = 23). Moderate correlation was seen between TCW and SW (y = -43.4 + 0.779 x, r = 0.815). The regional contraction amplitude (RCA), synchronous contraction index and RCW were 35.4 ± 3.5%, 95.4 ± 3.1% and 5.58 ± 0.97 mJ cm(-2)/beat in normal subjects, whereas those in patients with decreased ejection raction (EF) ≤ 30% (n = 6) were 19.6 ± 7.7%, 64.4 ± 32.2% and 2.58 ± 0.82 mJ cm(-2)/beat (p < 0.0001, Student's t-test). There was a poor correlation between RCW and RCA (y = 1.648 ± 0.116 x, r = 0.501) in normal subjects, suggesting that it might not be suitable to use RCA as an alternative to evaluate RCW.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hisatoshi Maeda (2012) conducted a cross-sectional in Decreased ejection fraction (n=29). Decreased ejection fraction (EF ≤ 30%) vs. Normal subjects was evaluated on Regional contraction work (RCW) (p=<0.0001). Regional contraction work evaluated from ECG-gated SPECT was significantly lower in patients with decreased ejection fraction compared to normal subjects (2.58 vs 5.58 mJ cm-2/beat; p<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: