Alfalfa was harvested in large round bales or small square bales and storage and feeding losses were determined for different storage methods.Large bales were stored 1) in a barn; 2) outside in single rows and uncovered; 3) outside in two-high stacks and covered; and 4) outside in three-high stacks and covered.These bales were fed to dairy heifers with small square bales for comparison.Dry matter storage losses were 2% for large bales stored inside, 6% for large bales stored outside covered, and 15% for large bales stored outside uncovered.Feeding losses of large bales were 12% for stored inside, 25% for stored outside uncovered, and 13 to 15% for stored outside covered.Total losses for large round bales were 40% (stored outside uncovered), 20% (stored outside covered) and 15% (stored inside).Intake and gains were greatest for small bales (2.35 kg/lO0 kg body weight and .77kg/d, respectively) and least for large bales (2.11 kg/100 kg body weight and .54kg/d) stored outside uncovered.Rain penetrated 10 to 25 cm into uncovered bales stored outside.The resulting weathered hay, about 40% of the original bale dry weight, deteriorated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Belyea et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: