Key result
Prior cancer is linked to ~3.6-fold higher risk of new cancer after VTE.
Why the study?
Previous randomized clinical trials did not support a benefit of screening for occult cancer after VTE diagnosis, although screening may benefit selected high-risk patients.
Cohort (n=3,706)
Yes
Hazard Ratio: 3.57 (95% CI 2.73–4.64)
p-value: p=<0.001
The incidence of newly diagnosed cancer after VTE is 3.7% at 1 year, with risk factors including older age, prior cancer, autoimmune disorders, prior major bleeding, and unprovoked VTE, which may help identify high-risk patients for targeted cancer screening.
May support risk-stratified cancer screening after VTE; leaves open whether screening improves outcomes in prospective trials.
BACKGROUND: Previous randomized clinical trials did not support a benefit of screening for occult cancer after diagnosis of venous thromboembolism (VTE), although screening may be of potential benefit for selected high-risk patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: The COMMAND VTE Registry-2 enrolled consecutive patients with acute symptomatic VTE between 2015 and 2020 from 31 centers across Japan. The 3,706 patients in the registry without known active cancer at the time of VTE diagnosis were divided into 2 groups: those with (n=250) and without (n=3,456) newly diagnosed cancer during the follow-up period. The cumulative incidence of newly diagnosed cancer was 1.5% at 30 days, 3.7% at 1 year, and 7.0% at 3 years. The multivariable Cox proportional hazard model demonstrated that older age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.02 per 1 year increase; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.03; P<0.001), a history of cancer (HR 3.57; 95% CI 2.73-4.64; P<0.001), autoimmune disorders (HR 1.48; 95% CI 1.06-2.02; P=0.02), a history of major bleeding (HR 1.64; 95% CI 1.04-2.48; P=0.04), and the absence of transient provoking risk factors for VTE (HR 1.44; 95% CI 1.08-1.92; P=0.01) were independently associated with newly diagnosed cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of newly diagnosed cancer after VTE diagnosis was 3.7% at 1 year, and several independent risk factors for newly diagnosed cancer after VTE diagnosis were identified.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamashita et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Acute symptomatic venous thromboembolism without known active cancer (n=3,706). History of cancer vs. No history of cancer was evaluated on Newly diagnosed cancer during the follow-up period (HR 3.57, 95% CI 2.73-4.64, p=<0.001). The 1-year cumulative incidence of newly diagnosed cancer after VTE was 3.7%, with a history of cancer strongly predicting a new cancer diagnosis (HR 3.57).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: