Key result
Significant regurgitation links to preload-independent diastolic indices and stable stroke volume during hemodialysis.
Why the study?
The study investigates changes in new diastolic echocardiographic indices in uremic patients undergoing regular hemodialysis, focusing on those with significant valvular regurgitation.
Does hemodialysis affect stroke volume and new diastolic echocardiographic indices differently in uremic patients with versus without significant aortic or mitral regurgitation?
Observational
Does hemodialysis affect stroke volume and new diastolic echocardiographic indices differently in uremic patients with versus without significant aortic or mitral regurgitation?
New echocardiographic diastolic indices in uremic patients with significant aortic or mitral regurgitation are relatively preload-independent, likely due to insignificant changes in stroke volume after hemodialysis.
May support timing echocardiography relative to dialysis in uremic patients; leaves open whether new diastolic indices predict outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the change in new diastolic indices in uremic patients who undergo regular hemodialysis (H/D). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied uremic patients receiving regular H/D. All patients were sinus rhythm before H/D. They had normal left ventricular systolic performance without regional wall motion abnormality. Patients were separated into two groups according to whether they had significant aortic or mitral regurgitation (AR or MR) or not. They received complete transthoracic echocardiographic examinations. Stroke volume (SV) was calculated as the product of the time-velocity integral (TVI) and cross-sectional area of aortic annulus. Flow propagation velocity (FPV) was measured by color M-mode echocardiography in apical four-chamber view. Mitral annulus tissue Doppler velocities--peak systolic (Sa), early diastolic, and late diastolic--were measured from septal and lateral wall. All these parameters were obtained immediately before and after H/D. Paired data were compared. RESULT: H/D amount was strongly correlated with the change of SV. After H/D, the reduction of SV in patients without AR or MR (control group) was obvious but it was not significant in patients with significant AR or MR (study group). There were significant differences in mitral inflow velocities, FPV, and mitral annular velocities (except septal Sa) in the control group. In the study group, predialytic and postdialytic parameters of new diastolic indexes had no statistical difference. CONCLUSION: New echocardiographic indexes of uremic patients with significant AR or MR were relatively preload-independent. The phenomenon was possibly related to insignificant change of SV after H/D.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hsiao et al. (2006) conducted an observational in Uremia requiring hemodialysis. Significant aortic or mitral regurgitation vs. No significant aortic or mitral regurgitation was evaluated on Change in stroke volume and diastolic indices after hemodialysis. Significant aortic or mitral regurgitation in uremic patients undergoing hemodialysis was associated with relatively preload-independent diastolic indexes and insignificant changes in stroke volume.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: