Key result
Doppler-echocardiographic mean pulmonary artery pressure demonstrated excellent diagnostic accuracy for pulmonary hypertension with an AUC of 0.95, outperforming systolic pressure estimates.
Why the study?
The validity of Doppler echocardiographic measurement of systolic pulmonary artery pressure for diagnosing pulmonary hypertension has been questioned, and mean pulmonary artery pressure may reflect invasive pressures more accurately.
Does Doppler echocardiographic measurement of mean pulmonary artery pressure accurately diagnose pulmonary hypertension compared to right heart catheterization?
Observational (n=241)
No
Does Doppler echocardiographic measurement of mean pulmonary artery pressure accurately diagnose pulmonary hypertension compared to right heart catheterization?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Doppler echocardiographic measurement of mean pulmonary artery pressure is highly accurate for diagnosing pulmonary hypertension and may help avoid unnecessary right heart catheterizations.
BACKGROUND: The validity of Doppler echocardiographic (DE) measurement of systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) has been questioned. Recent studies suggest that mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) might reflect more accurately the invasive pressures. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: 241 patients were prospectively studied to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of mPAP for the diagnosis of PH. Right heart catheterization (RHC) and DE were performed in 164 patients mainly for preoperative evaluation of heart valve dysfunction. The correlation between DE and RHC was better when mPAP (r=0.93) and not sPAP (r=0.81) was assessed. Bland-Altman analysis revealed a smaller variation of mPAP than sPAP. The following ROC analysis identified that a mPAP≥25.5 mmHg is useful for the diagnosis of PH. This value was validated in an independent cohort of patients (n=50) with the suspicion of chronic-thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. The calculated diagnostic accuracy was 98%, based on excellent sensitivity of 98% and specificity of 100%. The corresponding positive and negative predictive values were 100%, respectively 88%. CONCLUSION: mPAP has been found to be highly accurate for the initial diagnosis of PH. A cut-off value of 25.5 mmHg might be helpful to avoid unnecessary RHC and select patients in whom RHC might be beneficial.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Er et al. (2010) conducted an observational in Pulmonary Hypertension (n=241). Doppler-echocardiographic mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) vs. Doppler-echocardiographic systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy (Area Under the Curve) of mPAP for the diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension (AUC 0.95, 95% CI 0.914-0.983, p=<0.001). Doppler-echocardiographic mean pulmonary artery pressure demonstrated excellent diagnostic accuracy for pulmonary hypertension with an AUC of 0.95, outperforming systolic pressure estimates.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: