Key result
Serial NT-proBNP monitoring outperforms admission-only testing for predicting heart failure readmission risk.
Why the study?
The role of NT-proBNP in predicting hospital readmission risk in patients with heart failure, particularly at varying time frames, remains unclear.
Does NT-proBNP measurement predict hospital readmissions in patients with heart failure?
Systematic Review (n=3,380)
Does NT-proBNP measurement predict hospital readmissions in patients with heart failure?
Serial NT-proBNP measurements, rather than isolated admission values, offer stronger prognostic utility for predicting hospital readmissions in heart failure patients.
May enhance HF readmission risk stratification via serial monitoring; extends single-value paradigms in systematic evidence.
This systematic review examines the prognostic utility of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) for predicting hospital readmissions in patients with heart failure (HF). HF remains a leading cause of recurrent hospitalizations, contributing to increased morbidity and healthcare burden. While NT-proBNP is widely established for diagnosis and mortality prediction in HF, its role in forecasting hospital readmission risk-particularly at varying time frames-remains unclear. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) yielded 452 records, of which six studies met the inclusion criteria. These included one randomized controlled trial, one post hoc RCT analysis, and four observational or registry-based studies. The methodological quality was assessed using RoB 2.0, the NIH Quality Assessment Tool, and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, revealing low to moderate risk of bias. The review found that isolated NT-proBNP values at admission showed limited predictive value, while serial measurements during hospitalization or within early post-discharge periods (e.g., 30-180 days) demonstrated stronger associations with readmission risk. Predictive variability was influenced by factors such as timing of measurement, renal function, age, and sex. Comparators, where present, varied across studies and included standard care or alternative biomarkers. Notably, current clinical guidelines lack standardized protocols for using NT-proBNP in readmission risk prediction, leading to inconsistent applications in practice. This review underscores the need for individualized interpretation and standardized measurement strategies to enhance NT-proBNP's utility in discharge planning and post-acute care of patients with HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Laraib et al. (2025) conducted a systematic review in Heart Failure (n=3,380). NT-proBNP measurement vs. Standard clinical assessments or alternative biomarkers was evaluated on Hospital readmission. Serial NT-proBNP measurements during hospitalization or early post-discharge demonstrated stronger associations with heart failure readmission risk than isolated admission values.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: