Key result
MRI aligns with TTE for outlet VSD cusp prolapse but shows discordance in membranous defects.
Why the study?
The diagnostic agreement between magnetic resonance imaging and transthoracic echocardiography for coronary cusp prolapse in ventricular septal defect patients was unclear.
Does magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) improve the diagnosis of coronary cusp prolapse compared to transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in patients with ventricular septal defect?
Observational (n=23)
Does magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) improve the diagnosis of coronary cusp prolapse compared to transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in patients with ventricular septal defect?
MRI provides complementary diagnostic value to TTE for detecting coronary cusp prolapse, particularly in patients with membranous ventricular septal defects.
MRI may complement TTE in membranous VSDs; leaves open its value for coronary cusp prolapse detection.
PURPOSE: To compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in the diagnosis of coronary cusp prolapse (CCP) as a complication of ventricular septal defect (VSD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients (10 males, 13 females, mean age 9 years) with clinically suspected CCP were included in a retrospective study. Long and short axis cine images and electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated axial T1-weighted image MRI images were evaluated for deformity and protrusion of right and noncoronary cusps. We compared MRI and TTE results. We compared the agreement between MRI and TTE in outlet VSD and membranous VSD. RESULTS: On MRI, 19 patients had right coronary cusp prolapse (RCCP), three had noncoronary cusp prolapse (NCCP), and one patient had RCCP and NCCP on MRI. Twenty-two patients had RCCP on TTE and none had NCCP. Seventeen patients had outlet defects and six patients had a membranous defect at operation. All patients with an outlet VSD had RCCP on both MRI and TTE. The agreement between MRI and TTE in outlet VSD was better than in membranous VSD. CONCLUSION: MRI results corresponded with TTE results in patients with outlet VSDs, but discordant results were observed in patients with membranous VSDs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoshimura et al. (2010) conducted an observational in Ventricular septal defect-associated coronary cusp prolapse (n=23). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) vs. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was evaluated on Agreement between MRI and TTE in diagnosing coronary cusp prolapse. Magnetic resonance imaging results corresponded with transthoracic echocardiography in patients with outlet ventricular septal defects, but discordant results were observed in membranous defects.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: