Why the study?
Does transthoracic echocardiography accurately assess systemic right ventricular function and tricuspid regurgitation compared to MRI in adults with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries?
Does transthoracic echocardiography accurately assess systemic right ventricular function and tricuspid regurgitation compared to MRI in adults with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries?
Echocardiographic global longitudinal strain and quantitative TR assessment show strong agreement with MRI for evaluating systemic right ventricular function in adults with ccTGA.
Echo assessment of sRV function in ccTGA shows limited MRI agreement; leaves open routine clinical adoption pending validation studies.
BACKGROUND: The survival in adults with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (ccTGA) might be reduced due to dysfunction of the systemic right ventricle (sRV). The quantitative echocardiographic assessment of sRV function and tricuspid (systemic atrioventricular valve) regurgitation (TR) is still a diagnostic challenge. Thus, the aim of this study was to compare echocardiographic indices of sRV function and the degree of TR with corresponding MRI (magnetic resonance imaging)-derived parameters in adults with ccTGA. METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional study of adults with ccTGA referred to a tertiary congenital heart disease center was conducted. All patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography and MRI examinations. Thirty-three adults (19F/14M, mean age 34.1 years) were included. RESULTS: We found significantly lower fractional area change (FAC) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) values in patients with MRI-derived RV ejection fraction (EF) <45%. A cutoff GLS<-16.3% identified sRV EF ≥45% with a sensitivity of 77.3% and specificity of 72.7%. A very strong correlation between MRI- and echocardiography-derived TR volume was observed (r=.84; P<.0001). CONCLUSIONS: GLS is the variable with the best sensitivity but less specificity to distinguish between systemic RV EF ≥45% and below 45%, and it seems to be the preferred echocardiographic index of systemic RV function in adults with ccTGA. The quantitative assessment of TR by MRI and echocardiography showed a very strong agreement in patients with ccTGA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kowalik et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: