Key result
STE-derived myocardial deformation fails to correlate with cMRI-assessed single ventricle EF.
Why the study?
Impaired cardiac function remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in children after total cavopulmonary connection, and cMRI is limited by cost and availability for routine use.
Does myocardial deformation assessed by speckle tracking echocardiography correlate with single ventricle ejection fraction assessed by cMRI in children after total cavopulmonary connection?
Cross-Sectional (n=77)
Yes
Does myocardial deformation assessed by speckle tracking echocardiography correlate with single ventricle ejection fraction assessed by cMRI in children after total cavopulmonary connection?
Effect estimate: Pearson R -0.25
p-value: p=0.06
Speckle tracking echocardiography parameters of longitudinal myocardial deformation do not reliably predict single ventricle ejection fraction as measured by cMRI in children after TCPC.
Speckle tracking parameters do not correlate with CMR EF in single ventricles; leaves open their utility as a noninvasive surrogate pending validation.
Survival of children with single ventricle heart defects after the total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC) has improved, but impaired cardiac function remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) is the gold standard in assessing single ventricle volume and function, but high costs and limited availability hamper its routine use. A cheaper and more available alternative is echocardiography. Myocardial function can be studied in more detail using speckle tracking echocardiography (STE). The purpose of the study was to describe the association between myocardial deformation assessed by speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) and single ventricle function assessed by cMRI and to evaluate differences in myocardial deformation in children with single left and single right ventricular morphology. Cross-sectional, multicenter study in 77 children after TCPC was conducted. STE segmental and global longitudinal peak strain and systolic strain rate (SR) of the dominant ventricle were measured. Impaired SV function by cMRI was defined as ejection fraction (EF) < 45%. Mean age was 11.8 (range 9.7-14.3) years. Pearson R for cMRI EF versus global longitudinal strain and SR was - 0.25 (p = 0.06) and - 0.03 (p = 0.82), respectively. Global single ventricle longitudinal strain and SR was similar in patients after TCPC with single left and single right ventricular morphology (- 19.0 ± 3.1% vs 19.2 ± 3.2%, p = 0.94). STE myocardial deformation parameters do not correlate with single ventricle ejection fraction assessed by cMRI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koopman et al. (2017) conducted a cross-sectional in Single ventricle heart defects after total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC) (n=77). Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) derived myocardial deformation vs. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) derived ejection fraction was evaluated on Correlation between cMRI ejection fraction and global longitudinal strain (Pearson R -0.25, p=0.06). Speckle tracking echocardiography-derived myocardial deformation parameters do not correlate with single ventricle ejection fraction assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (Pearson R -0.25, p=0.06).
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: