Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: The study was conducted to evaluate the treatment outcomes of SUPERA™ stents in patients with de novo or restenotic lesions in the superficial femoral artery (SFA) or femoropopliteal artery (FPA). Materials and Methods: A real-world data collection registry across 20 centers in India enrolled patients (≥18 years) with SFA or FPA lesions treated with SUPERA™ stents. The registry was approved by the ethics committees of the respective sites and 284 subjects were enrolled prospectively after informed consent was obtained; data were collected specifically for this particular analysis. It evaluated baseline characteristics, procedural details, and quality of life, with primary outcome as 12-month freedom from target lesion revascularisation (TLR). Secondary outcomes included patency rate, stent fractures, all-cause death, clinical improvement on Rutherford–Becker classification, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using a 36-item Short Form Survey questionnaire. Comparisons were made between baseline and 12 months using Kaplan–Meier analysis, t -tests, and proportional comparisons. Results: At 12 months, 90.3% of patients were free from TLR, and 89.2% maintained primary patency with SUPERA™ stents; the all-cause death rate was 90.58%. Patients’ HRQoL showed significant improvement and 92% of the patients showed clinical improvement as per the Rutherford–Becker classification. No stent fractures were reported. A total of 12.7%, 75%, and 12.3% of patients were prescribed mono antiplatelet therapy, dual antiplatelet therapy, or triple antiplatelet therapy. Conclusion: SUPERA™ stents show promise in the management of peripheral artery disease with appreciable freedom from TLR, good primary patency, and notable improvements in HRQoL at 12 months.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parakh et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: