Key result
Regadenoson spares FEV1 decline versus placebo in asthma and COPD but causes more dyspnea.
Why the study?
Adenosine receptor stress agents for MPI may cause bronchoconstriction, raising safety concerns in patients with asthma or COPD.
Is regadenoson safe and well-tolerated compared to placebo in patients with asthma or COPD undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging?
RCT (n=999)
Double-blind
randomized
Is regadenoson safe and well-tolerated compared to placebo in patients with asthma or COPD undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging?
Regadenoson does not cause a significant decrease in FEV1 compared to placebo in patients with asthma or COPD, supporting its safety as a pharmacologic stress agent for MPI in this population, despite an increased incidence of dyspnea.
Supports regadenoson for MPI in asthma/COPD; confirms pulmonary safety in this RCT.
BACKGROUND: Adenosine receptor stress agents for myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) may cause A(2B) and/or A(3) receptor-mediated bronchoconstriction, of particular concern to physicians testing patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: A Phase 4, randomized, double-blind study (NCT00862641) assessed the safety of the selective A(2A) receptor agonist, regadenoson, compared with placebo in subjects with asthma or COPD who represented likely candidates for MPI. RESULTS: Overall, 356 and 176 subjects with asthma and 316 and 151 subjects with COPD received regadenoson and placebo, respectively. The percentage of subjects experiencing a >15% decrease in FEV(1) from baseline to any assessment up to 24 hours post-baseline was not statistically significantly different between the regadenoson and the placebo groups in the asthma or COPD stratum. Dyspnea, the most frequent respiratory adverse event, occurred with higher incidence (P < .0001) in the regadenoson group than the placebo group in the asthma (10.7% vs 1.1%) and COPD (18.0% vs 2.6%) strata. No subjects experienced severe bronchoconstriction, although the occurrence of such reactions with adenosine receptor agonists cannot be ruled out, such that caution is advised. CONCLUSIONS: This information may be helpful to physicians selecting a pharmacologic stress agent for MPI in patients with asthma or COPD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prenner et al. (2012) conducted an RCT in Asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (n=999). Regadenoson vs. Placebo was evaluated on >15% decrease in FEV(1) from baseline to any assessment up to 24 hours post-baseline. Regadenoson did not significantly increase the risk of a >15% decrease in FEV1 compared with placebo in patients with asthma or COPD, but caused more dyspnea (e.g., 18.0% vs 2.6% in COPD; P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: