Key result
Late reperfusion of the infarct-related artery was associated with significantly better left ventricular function at 1 month, supporting thrombolysis beyond 4-6 hours from symptom onset.
Why the study?
The effect of late reperfusion beyond 4-6 hours from symptom onset on left ventricular function and the role of infarct size in guiding thrombolytic therapy were uncertain.
Does late reperfusion (later than 4-6 hours from symptom onset) improve left ventricular function in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Cohort (n=386)
Does late reperfusion (later than 4-6 hours from symptom onset) improve left ventricular function in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Late reperfusion of an infarct-related artery beyond the traditional 4-6 hour window is associated with improved left ventricular function at 1 month.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Caution against routine late reperfusion from observational data alone; leaves open randomized confirmation of extended thrombolysis windows.
To evaluate the effect of late reperfusion of an infarct-related coronary artery on left ventricular (LV) function in the month after myocardial infarction (MI), findings from 386 patients in the Intravenous Streptokinase in Acute Myocardial Infarction (ISAM) trial were studied. All patients had a late peaking in the creatine kinase-MB serum time-activity curve, suggesting absence of early reperfusion. Significantly better LV function associated with patency of the infarct artery at angiography 1 month after the acute event confirmed the beneficial effect of reperfusion even if achieved beyond the time window for myocardial salvage. Thrombolysis commenced later than 4-6 h after symptom onset will be of benefit as long at it reopens infarct arteries more often and earlier than occurs spontaneously or from anticoagulation. The value of the size of the sum of ST-segment elevation (sigma ST increases) on admission ECG was evaluated from the total ISAM study population. The relation between sigma ST increases and final infarct size as well as mortality risk was highly significant. However, weak correlations largely limit the value of sigma ST increases to predict the outcome in an individual patient. Thus, whatever the relative beneficial effect in patients with smaller or larger MI may be, it would be unwarranted to withhold thrombolytic therapy from patients with smaller sigma ST increases on admission ECG.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schröder et al. (1990) conducted a cohort in Acute Myocardial Infarction (n=386). Late reperfusion of an infarct-related coronary artery vs. Absence of reperfusion was evaluated on Left ventricular (LV) function at 1 month. Late reperfusion of the infarct-related artery was associated with significantly better left ventricular function at 1 month, supporting thrombolysis beyond 4-6 hours from symptom onset.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: